Oh totally she is cynical and chosen by the establishment to oversee the plutocratic takeover, r or d means little, she opposes a new deal and frankly is the enemy All the D establishment is the enemy, there is no getting rid of r fascists with this controlled opposition.

Mamdami is a good start, we need different flavours if populists to challenge everywhere. Moderates are not the safe choice, reformers are.

If there is another Democratic president their plan went horribly arry because they plan on fixing elections. In case 2020 didn’t give it away…

This guy would have definitely thrown a fit if somebody else had their feet up on his seat.

Quite off base. It is running as the status quo that was the deciding factor, the fact that you don’t know that yet does not speak well to your understanding.

That is what I was trying to say as well I wholeheartedly agree.

It is spoon-fed to the Sheep as if that would justify keeping the same people in charge of the party that Force unwinnable candidates on us.

Racism is not the reason in the first place, but if it was it would not justify keeping the establishment in there.

The logic is too stupid to refute line by line. Somehow though that is what we are doing. The same people that chose Hillary and then Biden and then Kamala are going to choose the next one, and do everything they can to favor their choice. Including these super delegates which they still have.

Based on a false premise, Harris was universally unpopular with women and minorities and everyone else. Maybe that should just tell you that universally unpopular candidates are unpopular candidates and not their characteristics?

Just because someone is a woman or minority does not mean that women or minorities will support them. Frankly it is rather insulting that you think it would.

When you kick that horse in front of the gift when it is trying to drink you do.

Cynical posturing, same as hochul, but hochul’s endorsement actually meams something as governor.

We should not talk about kamala or biden or anyone that forced them or hillary on us unless is to demand their ousters.

Why is this news? She is not an elected official. She never breached 30% approval rating as vice president before her anointation.

Scotus willl find a way to cancel that. Probably also make it so the lower courts are unable to make any such determinations in the first place like they did with forbidden courts from issuing Nationwide injunctions, leaving us all at the absolute mercy of the executive branch in effect.

People do not realize how big of a decision that was, perhaps the worst the Supreme Court has ever made.

I will take your revised history under consideration, I read about this in history books so that consideration means little to me given all of the other revisionist history I have seen like rehabilitating history’s worst monsters rehabilitating feudalism.

Often for wealthy benefactors with an ax to grind or paying academics to prove over and over that the New Deal made things worse are you okay? Intellectual looking front that lawmakers can wave around when making changes after they are paid to do so.

Reality is under assault from every angle and reality is losing.

Or the hundreds of history books it is written in, I don’t know what your recent iteration of Wikipedia says, But that has been the history, you are the first person I have ever heard challenging it. If that is something that you got off of a recent Wikipedia edit, I would not be surprised there is some new form of revisionism going on.

That is not a piece of history that has ever been up for debate that I have seen, nor one that the Soviets have tried to hide or Russians have tried to deny. It was trotsky’s idea, and in the Ukraine war they may have dusted it off to some degree.

So I don’t know where you are getting that from but they absolutely were known for shooting anybody that retreated from their position no matter what the circumstance. They lost 17 million people.

But our courts now are so fucked that the lawyers will argue while it is cruel, it is not unusual because we are doing it all the time so therefore both of the terms of cruel and unusual aren’t met and the court has no business stepping in the way of our legitimate executive Authority.

Disallowing courts from Nationwide injunctions was a huge decision that is not recognized as such yet, that shows you where the Supreme Court is going to allow this to go, straight into the abyss. They think the Republic is already dead and all but name.

Once America got involved it was over for Germany. There is no scenario where Germany could have won with the US involved. Just fighting France and England and Russia they absolutely would have won. Could have anyway. How many people did the Russians sacrifice to get rid of the Germans, 17 million? Guys behind the lines to shoot anybody that Retreats from their position for any reason.

A sign that people don’t think they have a way to fight. We don’t have any leadership, fighting under the Democrats is a waste of time that sticks your neck out without accomplishing anything. You get some real leadership and you will get fight. Until you get rid of these Democrats that see themselves as controlled opposition this is what you will get.

Well I’m glad that being disagreeable to everyone as a matter of course is working out for you. As long as you’re happy that’s what’s important. Don’t worry about the fact that you’re giving everybody else fighting for the same things a bad name.

Guilt by association. You could definitely be sent to prison for it. Cheering on charging family members of people is beyond ignorant. It is something they have started to do though, the feds. Very unchristian.