You are giving youtube the benefit of the doubt, on israel, and 36 people agreed? Jesus christ.

The lawmakers would jamn them and parent corporation in a thousand ways not related to this. No evidence why they are jamning them to challenge in court. That is how it is done now.

Ie background checks for someone that would pass the check but has detractors, background check never comes through, they have no idea just wait they say. That way you have no right to get a copy of the information used against you as prescribed by law, no legal challenges, etc.

Lawyers working for super rich fucktwats run the west, and it is more of a shitshow everyday.

All social media has been since before the final solution for the gaza ghetto.

Including reddit, facebook, twitter, instagram, tik tok now.

In private companies courts decided we have no rights, but the government can lean on them in secret, creating a de facto government censorship of speech.

Same as warrantless surveillance, the government buys private data broker info without cause or warrant on everyone, does another end run around the bill of rights.

We need clear rules we can challenge enforcrment actiond on, I would say if not settled by an appeal to be decided by a jury of users, but I am an english common law partisan like that.

State laws could work but courts would cancel them the first time israel was criticized. And feds would pre empt.

Fb does not work from my phone, it gets glitchier every year. They are too busy on their stupid metaverse and counting their money to fix those glitches apparently.

This is small potatoes. Idk if any person even died from this, but they sure have from dow, dupont, chemours, monsanto, syngenta, oil and gas up and down supply chain, big ag, etc.

They are untouchable in courts somehow.

Payoff in addition to campaign donations and the usual under the table protection money.

Israel was behind it it appears, so naturally the us is covering it up for them.

Use ublockorigin, blocks but they cannot tell their site is blocked.

Nah, he is miming how he expects the military to take the collective cock of the party trying to turn america into israel and the occupied territories.

Lower courts have been cancelled in effect by earlier scotus decisions.

The admin will ignore them and scotus will find some way of letting party abuse the constitution and laws.

No nationwide injunctions folks, courts are forbidden from stopping the admin now.

I had previously let the cops shime a flashlight directly into the eyes to before it is different than what you are talking about it is to check for hope you or cocaine or other drug use that dilates your pupils or consricts them.

You are talking about a different test assuming it is the same.

My least favorite is shining the light directly into my eye at night. I refuse that one straight up. I find it very uncomfortable to have bright lights in my eyes and I do not trust those dipshits and anybody that tells them and is not bad for your vision, and they’re doing it in bad faith anyway. Plus I was completely sober. They do that to check the dilation of the pupils apparently. Most illegal drugs do like big pupils but opiates do small.

They are already well known for false positives on gunshots.

I was accused of being drunk or high and did one of those tests and they said it was a failure even though I didn’t show any impairment of motor skills. Arrested me, Drew my blood in the hospital, towed my car, then released me the next morning without charge, only to file charges 14 months later for supposedly having one nanogram per milliliter of THC despite the fact that I had not smoked at all anytime in the range. Had to pay 3K for a lawyer that got it dropped. Plus several hundred to get my car out of impound.

For sure, and we have all seen the videos of people trying to stick up for their rights in the wrong way and getting themselves in a world of trouble. And I have been there and it is very hard to tread the line between sticking up for yourself and not getting fucked worse by the police because they have so much power and unaccountable Authority. If they want to arrest you they will. And cooperating on things like sobriety tests outside of a breathalyzer which you cannot refuse without consequence, we’ll just give them probable cause as they will lie.

It is more disaffected people than nazis. At least the places I was at there. The site wide moderation is pretty fucked in favor of powerful interests, including Nazis however. They like to chase off real people that are driving engagement in favor of the legions of influence agents with their bot accounts.

It really will depend on how they run the trials. If they do get a jury of their peers, people from Memphis, the prosecutors will dismiss most of the bullshit. If they manage to get the trial set out in the Sticks they will make it stick and most of the cases. DC is kind of a special case because the jury pool is rather well informed.

We could be thankful they are coming off half cocked but seeing as the opposition is so weak and our institutions so rotted and captured it probably will not make a difference. They are trying to set precedent now so they can declare martial law later, 2028 in mind. The election.

As to the police saying you have glossy eyes, anyone at any time driving a vehicle they could pull over, accuse of being impaired, and in their expert opinion arrest you. People don’t realize that the laws actually allow them to charge you for impaired driving even if blood tests they get a warrant for shows zero drugs and zero alcohol. The system really is that fucked. And nobody in Authority ever wants to admit they were wrong about anything and they were all raised to have nothing but contempt for the rest of the population.