RegularJoe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoGlobal Warming [Photographic Evidence]lemmy.worldimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1456arrow-down132file-text
arrow-up1424arrow-down1imageGlobal Warming [Photographic Evidence]lemmy.worldRegularJoe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-21 month ago1720 is likely wrong. Most people women just didn’t wear enclosed underwear until the early 1800s. Before that you went commando. Edit for clarity
minus-squareRegularJoe@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agohttps://www.medievalists.net/2024/06/underwear-middle-ages/
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 month agoThat’s the medieval period and men, primarily. You want to look at the Roccoco period and women. I edited my original comment. But those are mostly loin cloths with tunics tucked into them the OP post shows knee length bloomers with gusset and waistband
![Global Warming [Photographic Evidence]](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2be6082e-452a-4258-85a4-74b229bf4bb4.png){kind=link}
1720 is likely wrong. Most
peoplewomen just didn’t wear enclosed underwear until the early 1800s. Before that you went commando.Edit for clarity
https://www.medievalists.net/2024/06/underwear-middle-ages/
That’s the medieval period and men, primarily. You want to look at the Roccoco period and women. I edited my original comment.
But those are mostly loin cloths with tunics tucked into them the OP post shows knee length bloomers with gusset and waistband