• lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Your anti-cheat doesn’t work anyway so let me play in linux you cowards.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They want to keep windows relevant so hard. Yeah, i enable secure boot, and let some kernel level anti cheat into my system. At least i don’t have to play with cheaters. Oh there are still cheaters. So glad

  • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love the Battlefield series but I’m not turning on Secure Boot for them. If it remains a hard requirement, I’ll simply be passing altogether.

    • PHLAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s nothing wrong with Secure Boot and enabling it can prevent a small subset of attack vectors with no real downsides. That being said, the things Secure Boot does protect against aren’t likely to be an issue for most users but it’s nothing to be afraid of.

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you want to install Linux, secure boot limits the distributions you can use. If you don’t then it’s whatever.

      • brezel@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        • some people run more than 1 OS
        • some people actually program and need to load unsigned shit all the time
        • some people have legacy hardware that doesn’t run with secureboot
        • it is my decision and my decision alone how i boot my operating systems. not EA’s.