• onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I watched two episodes before bouncing off hard. No idea how it got as popular as it did, because the jokes were just low effort and lazy.

  • TarantulaFudge@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I thought it was funny when it came out, but it hasn’t aged well at all. Very cringey and stereotypical, with a slight tinge of homophobia.

  • plm00@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If a show requires a laugh track to tell its viewers when to laugh, then it lacks substance enough to cause it without.

    • NKBTN@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t agree in general - I like the trad sitcom “sort of live” approach, as in Cheers and early Red Dwarf, but it is definitely used as you say far too often. The fecking Flintstones used a laugh track - an animated show.

      But search YouTube for “Big Bang Theory without Laugh Track” and you’ll see a dew examples of how shit most of the humour actually is

    • SomeDudeFromSpace@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I absolutely agree. You can find some parts of the show with the laugh track removed on YouTube, and it’s amazing to realise how unfunny the jokes really are.

  • plm00@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The autism representation is what happens when a writer has never met another person before.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love it. Watched it when it aired and catch reruns once in a while. I don’t watch a lot of the reruns but do watch them from time to time.

  • Nefara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The “laughs” all felt from the outside. There was very little humor aimed at the people who would self identify as nerds and way more “haha look at these nerds and how quirky they are” set ups. Sure there are misogynist asshole nerds but usually they need to grow beyond that to find friends and partners. As far as I could tell none of them did. Sheldon and Howard were still super sexist, Leonard was still passive and whiny, but the story pushed forward foisting “perfect matches” on them.

    Throughout the whole thing there was very little actual geek humor, and it felt denigrating to actual nerds.

      • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’ve always maintained it’s for non-nerds who want to laugh at cultures they’ll never understand. For convenience, all known nerd stuff is crammed into all characters.

  • lilpatchy2eyes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    My brother, my dad and I watched it together some 10+ years ago. I think people get too angry about it. Most sitcoms aren’t really funny, BBT isn’t unique. “Oh it has too much of a laugh track” they all do. I also think this idea that the show makes fun of nerd culture gets taken a little too far as well, for the same reason. The characters are sitcom characters. Name any sitcom and there will be dozens of youtube videos about how the characters are horrible to each other and don’t make good decisions. If they were decent, rational people then there wouldn’t be as much drama, so no show.