• Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Interesting thing about that is that, while it’s still common practice, a lot of more left-leaning women did away with taking their husband’s name years ago

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Look at how Teheran women were dressed in the 70s, and contrast that to how they’re dressed now. The same future awaits American women.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This isn’t a leaopards eating faces thing for republican women. These women derive social, economic, and political benefits through their association with the men who hold power in our patriarchal system. By aligning with backwards gender roles or evil ideologies, they feel protected and valued within the system even as it restricts their autonomy. They know what they’re doing.

    • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I read years ago that white republican women will put up with being treated as lesser in their circles in order to treat others as lesser. So they’re fine with being spoken down to and shuffled aside so they can feel free to yell at minorities.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember the MAGA women wearing the “You Can Grab My Pussy” shirts? Not all Republican women are going to be upset by this.

      • JohnScig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        really… yeah, let’s shed a tear for the poor republican women, waving “Mass Deportation Now” signs. They didn’t seem to care about dehumanization so much then. Now they are the ones being dehumanized, hopefully they’ll remember how that feels come mid-terms.

        • commander@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Stooping to their level doesn’t make us better than them.

          Try to understand that most of them don’t know any better and are just trying to look good in front of their peers who also do not know any better.

          • JohnScig@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Look, I try. Most of the time. I’m trying to be empathetic and nice and inclusive. But sometimes I wonder while fully grown adults can’t use Google. Why they would believe the most obvious lies (“they’re eating the dogs” is a great example - an absurd lie that was debunked 100x by every outlet within days). Again these are fully grown adults who choose to be hateful, angry and wilfully ignorant. In fact they revel in that ignorance. Warnings are “alarmist”, factchecks are “biased”, opponents are “traitors”. These are fully grown adults that would trade the price of eggs for suffering of thousands of “illegals” and they entrust this trade to Donald Trump, a man who in his life has never taken a shot into a toilet that wasn’t made out of gold. Like yeah, sure, THAT guy is gonna care about the poor.

            My point is, we’re all adults, we all make our choices as best we can. But if you keep making the same terrible choices and yell at anyone who tries to tell you they are bad choices, well… You deserve what’s coming to you, because you’ve unleashed that on all of us.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, a major problem in society is that two incomes are required to pay off a mortgage - and making one member of that equation unable to work society wide would solve that, leading to mortgages and hence housing price calibration (calibrating it to a single wage income)…

    …but I was kind of hoping that wouldn’t be a product of gender segregation. Also this seems like it’s going to affect a lot of other things and people women’s autonomy and hence freedom and safety in jeopardy.

    No Bueno.

    • earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it’s adorable that people believe that the capitalists would do away with female labor instead of going back to the good old days of just devaluing it. The myth that women didn’t work outside the home is a fiction. Only the upper classes could afford such a luxury. Poor woman always had to work, often for much less pay.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Poor woman always had to work, often for much less pay.

        Exactly. Women always worked - they were just segregated into lower paying jobs and had less rights (pregnant? no more job for you! and since you’re desperate, enjoy the shitty working conditions).

        There will always be poor single mothers that have to work to support their family. They just won’t have labor protections.