The majority of multiplayer games do not require kernel level anticheat. I play almost exclusively multiplayer games I just don’t play the dumb mainstream ones like fortnite or destiny
Yeah but you’re not the same person. They said they don’t play games with anticheat; didn’t mention anything about it being kernel level or not. Which implies that they only play single player games.
Kernel ac is pretty much the only one that doesn’t work. The vast majority of other anti cheats work perfectly fine under proton.
Like I said I play almost exclusively multiplayer games on Linux if that wasn’t clear, the only ones that don’t work are things like valorant, destiny, fortnite that are using kernel ac
What? You can play multiplayer games np lol. It’s just shitters like riot games, tarkov, GTA, and those other corpo fucks you can’t play on because they want to harvest your info.
I’m about to delete my comment cause you’re the third person now to respond with basically the same thing and I’m tried of clarifying myself. So just go read my reply to the first person who said something similar to what you did.
So what? I’m at work and I don’t have the mental energy to address all this shit, on top of my job duties.
I’m not required to engage if I don’t feel like it. You’re just a bunch of random sticklers and pendants on the internet, and as such, I don’t owe any of you a god damn thing.
My own mental health comes first. I regret even opening my mouth.
I’m not worked up; this is my normal state of being.
This shit is the same reason why I got a DUI when I was sober back in the 2010s. I was my usual excited self and the cop thought I was on something. So they drug tested me, found the weed I smoked 3 days prior, and that was enough for a charge since it wasn’t legal then.
Any idiot with half a brain will tell you that weed does the exact opposite of getting you all worked up, but they needed an excuse to charge me with something so the the weed being in my urine was what they went with.
No, the problem is that I have ADHD and was raised by mentally abusive narcissists. The childhood trauma never went away, so naturally I’m on edge all the god damn time. But I can assure you that I’m at homeostasis. I’m used to feeling amped 24/7, much to the annoyance of everyone around me.
I have no chill, and no tolerance for criticism 'cause that’s all I ever got from my parents growing up. So when people push back against me, I just shut down.
So what? I’m at work and I don’t have the mental energy to address all this shit, on top of my job duties.
Guy spends time arguing pure bullshit and propaganda, but doesnt have the mental energy to handle being called out and suddenly pretends hes such a poor, oppressed victim.
Just don’t take Internet discussions too seriously, friend. Sometimes I’m like you. I will force a topic, it doesn’t go the way I didn’t expect. So I have two options: continue, because the activity is interesting, or just say “fuck it, life is too short”, and move on. Both are okay.
You’re going to get dogpiled because you’re generalizing and people are calling you out for that. All your edits and bluster, when you could go back and just say you like a specific subset of games that are made by devs that are just lazy/shitty. Voila, maybe then everyone would stop replying with the same comment!
Or, ya know, just keep digging that hole. It’s funny either way.
What I don’t get is “easy anti cheat” seemed to work fine for elden ring (provided you created an empty file when SotE dropped and you didn’t have it). I have seen next to zero cheating in my experiences. Although I do realize souls type multiplayer is very different than competitive FPSs.
Enabling anticheat means the user must sacrifice many of their core freedoms just to play a video game. And in principle anticheat will never fully prevent cheating short of pointing a camera at the user and watch them the whole time they are playing.
I hope Linux community can push back. This whole thing is idiotic and harms the consumers.
No, all client side anti cheats are bad and won’t work. The user space ones are still privacy risks and most importantly is absolutely useless against someone who is determined to cheat.
solving anti-cheat would basically seal the Dingus
The way I solve anti-cheat is by never playing games that require it.
i want to play dayz tho
DayZ runs fine on Linux though
Just play something else. There’s literally hundreds of thousands of games out there that require no anti-cheat.
no thanks I’m good
oh okay. yw. gg.
So you only play single player games, then? How boring.
I can’t live without multiplayer titles; single player bots are too predictable and repetitive, no matter the game.
I am just replying to annoy you. ily
The majority of multiplayer games do not require kernel level anticheat. I play almost exclusively multiplayer games I just don’t play the dumb mainstream ones like fortnite or destiny
Yeah but you’re not the same person. They said they don’t play games with anticheat; didn’t mention anything about it being kernel level or not. Which implies that they only play single player games.
Kernel ac is pretty much the only one that doesn’t work. The vast majority of other anti cheats work perfectly fine under proton.
Like I said I play almost exclusively multiplayer games on Linux if that wasn’t clear, the only ones that don’t work are things like valorant, destiny, fortnite that are using kernel ac
No, plenty of multiplayer games dont have anti cheat systems on the client side lol.
What? You can play multiplayer games np lol. It’s just shitters like riot games, tarkov, GTA, and those other corpo fucks you can’t play on because they want to harvest your info.
I’m about to delete my comment cause you’re the third person now to respond with basically the same thing and I’m tried of clarifying myself. So just go read my reply to the first person who said something similar to what you did.
Weird you gotta spew blatant lies and misinformation just to service corpo dick.
Plenty of multiplayer games and MMOs are playable on linux. and they prove you don’t need invasive, spyware level access for anticheat.
See my reply to the other person. I already responded to a similar comment, and as such, I don’t feel like repeating myself.
I’ve never seen someone buckle under so little pressure
So what? I’m at work and I don’t have the mental energy to address all this shit, on top of my job duties.
I’m not required to engage if I don’t feel like it. You’re just a bunch of random sticklers and pendants on the internet, and as such, I don’t owe any of you a god damn thing.
My own mental health comes first. I regret even opening my mouth.
You could have just said you were wrong and moved on. Getting all worked up seems to be taking up a lot more energy.
I’m not worked up; this is my normal state of being.
This shit is the same reason why I got a DUI when I was sober back in the 2010s. I was my usual excited self and the cop thought I was on something. So they drug tested me, found the weed I smoked 3 days prior, and that was enough for a charge since it wasn’t legal then.
Any idiot with half a brain will tell you that weed does the exact opposite of getting you all worked up, but they needed an excuse to charge me with something so the the weed being in my urine was what they went with.
No, the problem is that I have ADHD and was raised by mentally abusive narcissists. The childhood trauma never went away, so naturally I’m on edge all the god damn time. But I can assure you that I’m at homeostasis. I’m used to feeling amped 24/7, much to the annoyance of everyone around me.
I have no chill, and no tolerance for criticism 'cause that’s all I ever got from my parents growing up. So when people push back against me, I just shut down.
Guy spends time arguing pure bullshit and propaganda, but doesnt have the mental energy to handle being called out and suddenly pretends hes such a poor, oppressed victim.
what a fuckin joke, lol.
Just don’t take Internet discussions too seriously, friend. Sometimes I’m like you. I will force a topic, it doesn’t go the way I didn’t expect. So I have two options: continue, because the activity is interesting, or just say “fuck it, life is too short”, and move on. Both are okay.
You’re going to get dogpiled because you’re generalizing and people are calling you out for that. All your edits and bluster, when you could go back and just say you like a specific subset of games that are made by devs that are just lazy/shitty. Voila, maybe then everyone would stop replying with the same comment!
Or, ya know, just keep digging that hole. It’s funny either way.
Has an uninformed, awful take, that belittles someone else… then cries the victim when people call him out. Nice
If you need to clarify something to someone in a reply… Also add your clarification as an edit instead of “Edit: OMG read my reply to that other guy”.
Might save your inbox from the… ~3 replies that you apparently can’t handle.
Sidenote: I’d hate to play multiplayer games with someone so fragile.
What I don’t get is “easy anti cheat” seemed to work fine for elden ring (provided you created an empty file when SotE dropped and you didn’t have it). I have seen next to zero cheating in my experiences. Although I do realize souls type multiplayer is very different than competitive FPSs.
cheating absolutely ruins a lot of my favorite fps games. many of them are unplayable unless you have some well moderated private server to play on
extremely so. yes good talk thank you
Enabling anticheat means the user must sacrifice many of their core freedoms just to play a video game. And in principle anticheat will never fully prevent cheating short of pointing a camera at the user and watch them the whole time they are playing.
I hope Linux community can push back. This whole thing is idiotic and harms the consumers.
Lots of games support anti-cheat in Linux. It’s critical to note that anti-cheat in general is not the issue.
Kernel-level anti-cheat however is. It’s a massive security issue and something that everyone, including Windows users, should roundly reject.
No, all client side anti cheats are bad and won’t work. The user space ones are still privacy risks and most importantly is absolutely useless against someone who is determined to cheat.
If the anti-cheat is client-side, that’s a solved problem, thanks to avoidance.
It’s solved, they just refuse to enable it