Any thoughts on the low effort rule? I think it’s neither necessary nor been enforced anyways.

Thanks for commenting before I clicked the link

What

I’ve seen a post on mastodon where some rsync stuff broke already :/

Is the 172. address on the same interface? Could just be some virtual docker interface being unrelated to the DHCP issue.

Yeah it’s like that in Europe. Part of it is covered by my mini photovoltaic (600Wp), but that’s not enough.

Two are fedi instances, one is “official (related to my legal name)” and mostly used for email, one for personal selfhosted stuff I want to access from outside without vpn (like this Lemmy instance), one used to be a local concert calendar which I sunset so it’s not needed anymore. Currently forgot the sixth one lol

Yearly:

• ~80€ for 6 domains (using all of them)
• 125€ electricity (480kWh, 0,26€/kWh)
• 540€ VPSes (joint projects where other admins have access, not entirely paid by myself though, still planning to migrate one of them into homelab)

Not counting ISP since we have that anyways.

No I think that’s the best way to do it. Strongly depends on the country you’re in, what kind of legal constructs it allows, but having some organization that’s in the contract instead of some person is the way to go. That org can then handle votings etc (can even use the instance for that).

It’s a fun idea and there’s similar ideas, but in the end, someone always has to be in the contract of the server provider or host the infrastructure at home and is basically the admin overlord. That person is also liable if illegal stuff shows up.

I don’t know if it has side effects when there’s issues with mounting or the like.

It would also interfere if you want to unmount it and forget to disable the cronjob.

You can run mount -a to mount all fstab entries. You could put that in a cronjob I guess

Both is fine. Maintaining different datasets has the administrative overhead you mentioned, but can have security benefits, e.g. if you use different users in the different docker services and adjust the NFS permissions correspondingly. If service A gets hacked and escapes the container but doesn’t get privilege escalation, it can’t access the other services’ data.

This is independent of which version you choose, but check whether adding some storage to Proxmox is an option. Having TrueNAS as a runtime dependency for all your services can get annoying real quick.

Thanks! Makes him even worse (doesn’t change whether I think it should be in this community though)

Yeah it’s happening on one instance. Nobody has to adhere his call, where is it btw?

It’s good to call that shit out now and then in right place, but instance moderation is still moderation.

It’s what used to be called fedi meta. This sub specifically says it’s not about grievances with moderation etc. This post is clearly about a moderation issue. One admin who also happens to be a dev is moderating poorly - sure, but not what this community is about.

But it claims to be.

Even if you ignore the slur, the frogs and the rune in the background: Building a chat network with proper e2ee in a few weeks doesn’t sound good. It’s clear this is made with LLMs and I wouldn’t trust it’s everyone nat all.

Here’s some offers on professional support: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/professional-services/issues

Yeah I like them as well, it’s what we use at work. The article doesn’t leave me optimistic though