• thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Bold of them to assume that there will still be electricity, world wide web and freedom to play video games in 2030

  • SomeRandomNoob@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Blizzard can go fuck them self. I’m a big Starcraft fan. And i’m not going to buy anything from them. And i suggest everyone else does the same.

      • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I have no faith that current Blizzard would be able to beat StarCraft 2 anyways, they would just hurt the scene by dividing the playerbase more and SC3 would likely fizzle out sooner

        • Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Ain’t it a shame. Makes ya wonder if the folks who make these games actually even play em.

          Hell, that should be a law for gaming. You have to play your game at least 3 to 4 times a month atleast to see the bullshit and fix it.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    If they were announcing Starcraft 3 (and it was going to be an RTS game) I can understand there being some excitement around it even four years in advance because there’s so few RTS games being made.

    But a Starcraft shooter? Meh.

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    StarCraft II is one of my favorite games ever, but I have no faith in modern Blizzard to make a game that isn’t wrapped in trappings that would piss me off. Back in 2010, it was extremely annoying that the game required an internet connection and made us go through all sorts of wacky solutions just to have a LAN party. Nowadays, an online-only game is a non-starter for me. The story in SC2 jumped the shark after the Wings of Liberty campaign anyway.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I played through Diablo 4, and honestly, the frustrating part is that there’s a genuinely good game buried underneath all the live-service bullshit.

        The core gameplay works. The combat feels good, the classes are fun, the world is well designed, and there’s a solid Diablo game in there. If Blizzard had simply made it a traditional single-player Diablo game with optional online multiplayer, I think it could have been fucking phenomenal.

        Instead, they decided they needed the live-service model.

        And that created a massive problem: there was barely an endgame. Once you finished the campaign, the game basically became a loop of running the same types of activities over and over again, waiting for Blizzard to drip-feed additional content through seasons and updates. The live-service content wasn’t arriving quickly enough to justify the structure they’d built the entire game around.

        That’s what pisses me off about modern game development. Publishers keep chasing the idea that every game needs to become an endlessly monetized platform. Sony wants it. EA wants it. Everyone wants the next Fortnite or Destiny, despite the fact that most of them can’t actually pull it off.

        Diablo 4 didn’t need to be a live service.

        It just needed to be a really fucking good Diablo game.

        There was a damn good game in there. They just built the wrong fucking business model around it.

  • Redacted@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Please god i wish they would just release more sc2 coop commamders and missions.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The cinematic was fire, but I wasn’t getting “open world shooter” from it. Rather, I thought this was “Helldivers 2 with Starcraft window dressing,” which would be awesome I won’t lie.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’d love a Helldivers type game where I don’t have to worry about it frying my computer. A CTD or something I can stomach, but a full system freeze? In this economy?

    • absquatulate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Same. Smells like a (fairly generic) co-op shooter to me. It might end up being good, but with the state of blizzard and microsoft these days I’m not really excited for this.

      • Poopfeast420@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        For me, the 2030 release date (+eventual delays) lines up with Microsoft’s recent push/wish for more games in their big franchises a couple of months ago, so this is probably still in some kind of pre-production.

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Doesn’t the red armor means he’s a Firebat? The rifle going dry would explain that, those Overlords looked menacing as hell too

    • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nah, that.was just a classic set of Marine armor, but in Terran Dominion colors, as opposed to the more typical good guy blue. Given the speaker in the trailer sounds a lot like Arcturus Mengsk in full Emperor mode, I’m guessing that this game takes place in between SC 1&2. Maybe even during the Brood War? Seems like that would make sense for their open world shooter set up.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    A game being announced for years in the future and all they have to show is a cinematic screams vaporware to me