is it really a case of one person “accusing” someone of something, when the thing is literally what happened?
You can make accusations about things that literally happened.
ok.
but here’s a better headline that doesn’t paint stephen colbert as the sole entitiy “accusing” someone of doing a thing that the someone literally did
It is stated as an accusation, because the headline is also a statement from CBS network and publisher (Guardian). Both could be reviewed as separate reviewable pieces by FCC. I believe they are both being cautious.
In video, Colbert notes it was a “purely a financial decision.”
F fascism
He didn’t accuse them…
He flat out said it was happening.
FCC has domain over broadcast (not cable) and radio.
They’re going after late show hosts on the “free” networks, but have explicitly said they’re not going to enforce the same rules on talk radio, because “that’s not the focus”.
They’re only enforces rules against people who disagreeing against them politically
It’s fucking obvious, there’s no allegedly here, it’s clearly happening and the FCC has publicly acknowledged the bias
Talarico’s big bombshell: Talking about Christianity. The “Christian Nationalists” don’t want him doing that. He’s talking about the wrong kind of Christianity.
“Deep State Censors Texas Christian” would be the headline we need to reach the people who could benefit from his message.
Talarico’s big bombshell: Talking about Christianity. The “Christian Nationalists” don’t want him doing that. He’s talking about the wrong kind of Christianity.
Precisely. Talarico is a Christian who actually takes the part about looking after the needy and the sick, and having empathy for other human beings, seriously. We can’t have that in Texas!
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
deleted by creator
Why yes, I would vote Colbert for president.
I want the alternate timeline where, rather than just doing it to highlight the bullshit pac rules. Stewart and Colbert actually ran
Colbert should go to a different network. Or post the whole segment on YouTube like John Oliver does. Or both.
He did. https://youtu.be/oiTJ7Pz_59A
First they came for the Palestinians, I didn’t care because I was not a Palestinian…
I haven’t watched a Colbert monologue in the last year, and I haven’t watched any Colbert interviews for much longer than that. I’m going to keep my record unblemished, thank you very much.
UNLESS Trump doesn’t want me to see it. Then let’s fire up that YouTube baby!
